<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The richest 20% are getting richer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/01/08/richest-20-of-families-by-income/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/01/08/richest-20-of-families-by-income/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Class Envy? &#124; Out in Left Field with Pat Johnston</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/01/08/richest-20-of-families-by-income/comment-page-1/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>Class Envy? &#124; Out in Left Field with Pat Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mulbrandon.com/?p=14#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a real strong message, especially when you consider the graph below: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a real strong message, especially when you consider the graph below: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/01/08/richest-20-of-families-by-income/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mulbrandon.com/?p=14#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Yeah - as per Boondogle, there is no way that standard of living is less than in 1980. This is very misleading. I love this site, love it - but this is not presented well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; as per Boondogle, there is no way that standard of living is less than in 1980. This is very misleading. I love this site, love it &#8211; but this is not presented well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boondogle</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/01/08/richest-20-of-families-by-income/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Boondogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mulbrandon.com/?p=14#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Not really.  Income is not a pie where some get more and others get less.  Actually everybody is getting more as more and more wealth is created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really.  Income is not a pie where some get more and others get less.  Actually everybody is getting more as more and more wealth is created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evegiftstib</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/01/08/richest-20-of-families-by-income/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>evegiftstib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mulbrandon.com/?p=14#comment-16</guid>
		<description>ÐšÑ€Ð°Ð¹Ð½Ðµ Ñ…Ð¾Ñ‡ÐµÑ‚ÑÑ Ð½Ð°Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ°Ñ‚ÑŒ Ð³Ð°Ð´Ð¾ÑÑ‚ÑŒ, Ð½Ð¾ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑ‚ Ñ Ð¾Ð´Ð¸Ð½ Ñ‚Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð¹, Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð¾Ð¶Ð´Ñƒ Ð´Ñ€ÑƒÐ³Ð¸Ñ… ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ñ‚Ð°Ñ€Ð¸ÐµÐ²</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ÐšÑ€Ð°Ð¹Ð½Ðµ Ñ…Ð¾Ñ‡ÐµÑ‚ÑÑ Ð½Ð°Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ°Ñ‚ÑŒ Ð³Ð°Ð´Ð¾ÑÑ‚ÑŒ, Ð½Ð¾ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑ‚ Ñ Ð¾Ð´Ð¸Ð½ Ñ‚Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð¹, Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð¾Ð¶Ð´Ñƒ Ð´Ñ€ÑƒÐ³Ð¸Ñ… ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¼ÐµÐ½Ñ‚Ð°Ñ€Ð¸ÐµÐ²</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

