Comments on: 2005 US Income Distribution http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:17:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Carl Von Snarl http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1436 Carl Von Snarl Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:10:00 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1436 NO DOUBT.  And what about "after subsidies"?  Of course, all the liberal twits never take a moment to consider household, size, taxes, subsidies, etc. - they just rush to congratulate themselves about how right they've always been about how terribly inequitable things are and how we can fix it all with redistribution. NO DOUBT.  And what about “after subsidies”?  Of course, all the liberal twits never take a moment to consider household, size, taxes, subsidies, etc. – they just rush to congratulate themselves about how right they’ve always been about how terribly inequitable things are and how we can fix it all with redistribution.

]]> By: “2005 US Income Distribution” — Catherine Mulbrandon « Supporting the 99% http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1407 “2005 US Income Distribution” — Catherine Mulbrandon « Supporting the 99% Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:46:23 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1407 [...] bonus. It can be viewed by anyone with a Google Account.)” Catherine Mulbrandons info-graphic “2005 US Income Distribution” is an elegant chart. I looked this info up since WSJ mentioned 99%  included people making 500,000 [...] [...] bonus. It can be viewed by anyone with a Google Account.)” Catherine Mulbrandons info-graphic “2005 US Income Distribution” is an elegant chart. I looked this info up since WSJ mentioned 99%  included people making 500,000 [...]

]]> By: good job, religious right! - Page 3 http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1359 good job, religious right! - Page 3 Thu, 06 Oct 2011 02:24:44 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1359 [...] Re: good job, religious right! I've seen the data and use it in class. "evenly" is probably more accurately stated as symmetrical. While 50% lies above and below the media, the wealth distribution is not symmetrical. In plain english, you cannot make less than 0, but you can make a lot more than $50K Here's a reasonable link http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006...-distribution/ [...] [...] Re: good job, religious right! I've seen the data and use it in class. "evenly" is probably more accurately stated as symmetrical. While 50% lies above and below the media, the wealth distribution is not symmetrical. In plain english, you cannot make less than 0, but you can make a lot more than $50K Here's a reasonable link http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006…-distribution/ [...]

]]> By: Well, this is terrifying | The Stay-at-Home Feminist Mom http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1341 Well, this is terrifying | The Stay-at-Home Feminist Mom Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:06:31 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1341 [...] class is defined as people who fall between the 30% and 70% percentile of income distribution. The median income in the US is $46,326.  Poverty is defined as “$22,350 (total yearly income) for a family of four”. [...] [...] class is defined as people who fall between the 30% and 70% percentile of income distribution. The median income in the US is $46,326.  Poverty is defined as “$22,350 (total yearly income) for a family of four”. [...]

]]> By: 2005 US Income Distribution – インフォグラフィックス http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1053 2005 US Income Distribution – インフォグラフィックス Fri, 08 Apr 2011 05:50:26 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1053 [...] VisualizingEconomics Comments [...] [...] VisualizingEconomics Comments [...]

]]> By: Prof.K.Prabhakar http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-908 Prof.K.Prabhakar Tue, 28 Dec 2010 06:43:00 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-908 It is really useful for teachers. Is it possible to show data from 1930's. Thanks. It is really useful for teachers. Is it possible to show data from 1930′s. Thanks.

]]> By: Derick http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-907 Derick Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:15:00 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-907 i make somewhere around 1800 to 2500 a month depending on overtime. regularly i make 12.50 an hour which on a 40 hour week is 500 but that is before taxes.. I have a wife (doesnt work) and two kids.. which class would i fall under. Lower or middle i make somewhere around 1800 to 2500 a month depending on overtime. regularly i make 12.50 an hour which on a 40 hour week is 500 but that is before taxes.. I have a wife (doesnt work) and two kids.. which class would i fall under. Lower or middle

]]> By: Eat The Rich : : Electric Monkey Pants http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-137 Eat The Rich : : Electric Monkey Pants Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:45:22 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-137 [...] at what the rest of the population makes in comparison to those $250,000 (minimum) [...] [...] at what the rest of the population makes in comparison to those $250,000 (minimum) [...]

]]> By: Notable readings of the day 09/29/2010 « Pro Bozo Publico http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-136 Notable readings of the day 09/29/2010 « Pro Bozo Publico Fri, 01 Oct 2010 23:26:40 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-136 [...] of Chicago whose annual household income exceeds $250,000, putting him comfortably ahead of 98 percent of his fellow Americans. Henderson was foolish enough to write a blog post venturing that even [...] [...] of Chicago whose annual household income exceeds $250,000, putting him comfortably ahead of 98 percent of his fellow Americans. Henderson was foolish enough to write a blog post venturing that even [...]

]]> By: Jeff Fiddler http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-135 Jeff Fiddler Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:51:58 +0000 http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-135 Fantastic Chart....I just wrote up a review for Robert Whapples course for the Teaching Company on Modern Economic Issues. I don't give a hoot about minor fudges in your chart. Transefer payments and single incomes are a drop in the bucket. I want everyone to see the disaster we are in. Have you updated this for 2010? It's like the census and statistics will not show the gross inequality of our country's economy and how it's getting worse... I love the description called the L curve.....where 99 percent of us are on the base and 1 percent are on the upright.... Fantastic Chart….I just wrote up a review for Robert Whapples course for the Teaching Company on Modern Economic Issues. I don’t give a hoot about minor fudges in your chart. Transefer payments and single incomes are a drop in the bucket. I want everyone to see the disaster we are in. Have you updated this for 2010? It’s like the census and statistics will not show the gross inequality of our country’s economy and how it’s getting worse…

I love the description called the L curve…..where 99 percent of us are on the base and 1 percent are on the upright….

]]>