<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2005 US Income Distribution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 01:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where does rich Americans&#039; wealth come from? - Quora</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Where does rich Americans&#039; wealth come from? - Quora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>[...] is a cool chart of the bottom 98% of households, which tops off at $250K per year: http://visualizingeconomics.com/...If you look at the Forbes list of billionaires that&#039;s where the capital gains trend becomes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a cool chart of the bottom 98% of households, which tops off at $250K per year: http://visualizingeconomics.com/&#8230;If you look at the Forbes list of billionaires that&#039;s where the capital gains trend becomes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imobiliare - Page 1435</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Imobiliare - Page 1435</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>[...] was at 17:57 ----------  P.S.: uite alt graf cu distributia de venit. Pe familie. In SUA. In 2005: 2005 US Income Distribution  ---------- Post added at 18:31 ---------- Previous post was at 18:05 ----------        Originally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was at 17:57 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-  P.S.: uite alt graf cu distributia de venit. Pe familie. In SUA. In 2005: 2005 US Income Distribution  &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Post added at 18:31 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- Previous post was at 18:05 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-        Originally [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Von Snarl</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Von Snarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1436</guid>
		<description>NO DOUBT.  And what about &quot;after subsidies&quot;?  Of course, all the liberal twits never take a moment to consider household, size, taxes, subsidies, etc. - they just rush to congratulate themselves about how right they&#039;ve always been about how terribly inequitable things are and how we can fix it all with redistribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO DOUBT.  And what about &#8220;after subsidies&#8221;?  Of course, all the liberal twits never take a moment to consider household, size, taxes, subsidies, etc. &#8211; they just rush to congratulate themselves about how right they&#8217;ve always been about how terribly inequitable things are and how we can fix it all with redistribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;2005 US Income Distribution&#8221; &#8212; Catherine Mulbrandon &#171; Supporting the 99%</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;2005 US Income Distribution&#8221; &#8212; Catherine Mulbrandon &#171; Supporting the 99%</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>[...] bonus. It can be viewed by anyone with a Google Account.)&#8221; Catherine Mulbrandons info-graphic &#8220;2005 US Income Distribution&#8221; is an elegant chart. I looked this info up since WSJ mentioned 99%  included people making 500,000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bonus. It can be viewed by anyone with a Google Account.)&#8221; Catherine Mulbrandons info-graphic &#8220;2005 US Income Distribution&#8221; is an elegant chart. I looked this info up since WSJ mentioned 99%  included people making 500,000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: good job, religious right! - Page 3</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1359</link>
		<dc:creator>good job, religious right! - Page 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 02:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1359</guid>
		<description>[...] Re: good job, religious right!    I&#039;ve seen the data and use it in class.  &quot;evenly&quot; is probably more accurately stated as symmetrical.  While 50% lies above and below the media, the wealth distribution is not symmetrical.  In plain english, you cannot make less than 0, but you can make a lot more than $50K  Here&#039;s a reasonable link   http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006...-distribution/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Re: good job, religious right!    I&#039;ve seen the data and use it in class.  &quot;evenly&quot; is probably more accurately stated as symmetrical.  While 50% lies above and below the media, the wealth distribution is not symmetrical.  In plain english, you cannot make less than 0, but you can make a lot more than $50K  Here&#039;s a reasonable link   <a href="http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006" rel="nofollow">http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006</a>&#8230;-distribution/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Well, this is terrifying &#124; The Stay-at-Home Feminist Mom</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1341</link>
		<dc:creator>Well, this is terrifying &#124; The Stay-at-Home Feminist Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1341</guid>
		<description>[...] class is defined as people who fall between the 30% and 70% percentile of income distribution. The median income in the US is $46,326.&#160; Poverty is defined as “$22,350 (total yearly income) for a family of four”. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] class is defined as people who fall between the 30% and 70% percentile of income distribution. The median income in the US is $46,326.&nbsp; Poverty is defined as “$22,350 (total yearly income) for a family of four”. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2005 US Income Distribution &#8211; インフォグラフィックス</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>2005 US Income Distribution &#8211; インフォグラフィックス</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 05:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>[...] VisualizingEconomics        Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VisualizingEconomics        Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prof.K.Prabhakar</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof.K.Prabhakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-908</guid>
		<description>It is really useful for teachers. Is it possible to show data from 1930&#039;s. Thanks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really useful for teachers. Is it possible to show data from 1930&#8242;s. Thanks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derick</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Derick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-907</guid>
		<description>i make somewhere around 1800 to 2500 a month depending on overtime. regularly i make 12.50 an hour which on a 40 hour week is 500 but that is before taxes.. I have a wife (doesnt work) and two kids.. which class would i fall under. Lower or middle
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i make somewhere around 1800 to 2500 a month depending on overtime. regularly i make 12.50 an hour which on a 40 hour week is 500 but that is before taxes.. I have a wife (doesnt work) and two kids.. which class would i fall under. Lower or middle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eat The Rich : : Electric Monkey Pants</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Eat The Rich : : Electric Monkey Pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/11/05/2005-us-income-distribution/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] at what the rest of the population makes in comparison to those $250,000 (minimum) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at what the rest of the population makes in comparison to those $250,000 (minimum) [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

