<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Historical Tax Rates by Income Group [NYTimes]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Coles</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>Biased? try taking a look at much of the data at whitehouse.gov--the omb section. This has excellent historical data going back to the 1930s. Try to correlate the eras of huge tax cuts (especially for the wealthy--including capital gains), with revenue generated. You will find that as a percentage of GDP whenever there were large tax cuts, revenue almost always declined (especially when you consider the normal business cycle--ups and downs). It is absolute hogwash that revenues increase when tax rates decline. This is the supply-side myth that has zero basis in reality. 




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biased? try taking a look at much of the data at whitehouse.gov&#8211;the omb section. This has excellent historical data going back to the 1930s. Try to correlate the eras of huge tax cuts (especially for the wealthy&#8211;including capital gains), with revenue generated. You will find that as a percentage of GDP whenever there were large tax cuts, revenue almost always declined (especially when you consider the normal business cycle&#8211;ups and downs). It is absolute hogwash that revenues increase when tax rates decline. This is the supply-side myth that has zero basis in reality. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Anderson</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>hey guys do you know any site or book that can give me the historical data of the federal reserve fund rates (AKA interest rates)? I&#039;ve been looking for awhile and I can&#039;t find one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey guys do you know any site or book that can give me the historical data of the federal reserve fund rates (AKA interest rates)? I&#8217;ve been looking for awhile and I can&#8217;t find one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missing the Point &#124; Notes</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>Missing the Point &#124; Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>[...] sector had something to do with it. Or maybe not, depending on who you ask. Maybe it&#8217;s the plummeting tax rates for the highest earners. Either way, if we know that income inequality is a problem, and that economic growth would be more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sector had something to do with it. Or maybe not, depending on who you ask. Maybe it&#8217;s the plummeting tax rates for the highest earners. Either way, if we know that income inequality is a problem, and that economic growth would be more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josiah Perillo</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Josiah Perillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>Yes, agree with this and the others. What is missing is a chart that shows the real taxes paid by each of these income groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, agree with this and the others. What is missing is a chart that shows the real taxes paid by each of these income groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zelduh</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>zelduh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>Corporations find tax deductions to reduce their NET TAXABLE INCOME.

A really good deduction is payroll, which is 100% deductible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corporations find tax deductions to reduce their NET TAXABLE INCOME.</p>
<p>A really good deduction is payroll, which is 100% deductible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zelduh</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>zelduh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>Can you make a chart like this, but do it AFTER TAX DEDUCTIONS ARE TAKEN???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you make a chart like this, but do it AFTER TAX DEDUCTIONS ARE TAKEN???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: After the crash: the pauperisation of middle-class America &#124; The Long Good Read</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>After the crash: the pauperisation of middle-class America &#124; The Long Good Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>[...] else&#8217;s tax rates. Half or more of today&#8217;s federal deficits would be gone if we simply taxed the richest US citizens at the rates in effect in the 1950s and 1960s. If we also taxed corporations in relation to individuals as we did in the 1940s, the entire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] else&#8217;s tax rates. Half or more of today&#8217;s federal deficits would be gone if we simply taxed the richest US citizens at the rates in effect in the 1950s and 1960s. If we also taxed corporations in relation to individuals as we did in the 1940s, the entire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: After the crash: the pauperisation of middle-class America &#124; Cyber Drive</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>After the crash: the pauperisation of middle-class America &#124; Cyber Drive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>[...] else&#8217;s tax rates. Half or more of today&#8217;s federal deficits would be gone if we simply taxed the richest US citizens at the rates in effect in the 1950s and 1960s. If we also taxed corporations in relation to individuals as we did in the 1940s, the entire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] else&#8217;s tax rates. Half or more of today&#8217;s federal deficits would be gone if we simply taxed the richest US citizens at the rates in effect in the 1950s and 1960s. If we also taxed corporations in relation to individuals as we did in the 1940s, the entire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is It Time For A New Economic System? - PSFK</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>Is It Time For A New Economic System? - PSFK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>[...] else&#8217;s tax rates. Half or more of today&#8217;s federal deficits would be gone if we simply taxed the richest US citizens at the rates in effect in the 1950s and 1960s. If we also taxed corporations in relation to individuals as we did in the 1940s, the entire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] else&#8217;s tax rates. Half or more of today&#8217;s federal deficits would be gone if we simply taxed the richest US citizens at the rates in effect in the 1950s and 1960s. If we also taxed corporations in relation to individuals as we did in the 1940s, the entire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Couldn&#8217;t possibly happen here though &#8211; After the crash: the pauperisation of middle-class America &#124;</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/comment-page-1/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>Couldn&#8217;t possibly happen here though &#8211; After the crash: the pauperisation of middle-class America &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 13:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2007/11/03/nytimes-historical-tax-rates-by-income-group/#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>[...] else&#8217;s tax rates. Half or more of today&#8217;s federal deficits would be gone if we simply taxed the richest US citizens at the rates in effect in the 1950s and 1960s. If we also taxed corporations in relation to individuals as we did in the 1940s, the entire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] else&#8217;s tax rates. Half or more of today&#8217;s federal deficits would be gone if we simply taxed the richest US citizens at the rates in effect in the 1950s and 1960s. If we also taxed corporations in relation to individuals as we did in the 1940s, the entire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

