<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Income Inequality: Democratic vs Republican Administrations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visualizingeconomics.com/2008/04/27/income-inequality-democratic-vs-republican-administrations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2008/04/27/income-inequality-democratic-vs-republican-administrations/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brigham A</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2008/04/27/income-inequality-democratic-vs-republican-administrations/comment-page-1/#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator>Brigham A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/04/27/income-inequality-democratic-vs-republican-administrations/#comment-1445</guid>
		<description>

The practices and ideology of both parties has changed
dramatically during this time table making this paper impractical outside of a macro
view although it is interesting. The fact a group is dem or rep is sort of
generic. In addition, Dem/Rep income is calculated by average per capita income
for red and blue states not on actual voter data. There are no county factors
and there are no factors for how blue or how red a state is; also rendering
this information impractical. Blue states are generally larger population, higher
cost of living states besides and there is no consideration for expendable
income percentages compared to gross income percentages. I would hypothesize that
this information simply indicates the developing of the mid/west and the purpling
of the country. I’d like to see the population changes for this same time
frame. Perhaps the red states are just procreating greedy little gop babies
faster?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The practices and ideology of both parties has changed<br />
dramatically during this time table making this paper impractical outside of a macro<br />
view although it is interesting. The fact a group is dem or rep is sort of<br />
generic. In addition, Dem/Rep income is calculated by average per capita income<br />
for red and blue states not on actual voter data. There are no county factors<br />
and there are no factors for how blue or how red a state is; also rendering<br />
this information impractical. Blue states are generally larger population, higher<br />
cost of living states besides and there is no consideration for expendable<br />
income percentages compared to gross income percentages. I would hypothesize that<br />
this information simply indicates the developing of the mid/west and the purpling<br />
of the country. I’d like to see the population changes for this same time<br />
frame. Perhaps the red states are just procreating greedy little gop babies<br />
faster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crystal</title>
		<link>http://visualizingeconomics.com/2008/04/27/income-inequality-democratic-vs-republican-administrations/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>crystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/04/27/income-inequality-democratic-vs-republican-administrations/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>I like the way you think.  I&#039;m going to tell some of my friends on the left about your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way you think.  I&#8217;m going to tell some of my friends on the left about your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

